Clues for estimating market beta

January 6, 2018

A new empirical paper compares methods for estimating “beta”, i.e. the sensitivity of individual asset prices to changes in a broad market benchmark. It analyzes a large range of stocks and more than 50 years of history. The findings point to a useful set of initial default rules for beta estimation: [i] use a lookback window of about one year, [ii] apply an exponential moving average to the observations in the lookback window, and [iii] adjust the statistical estimates by reasonable theoretical priors, such as the similarity of betas for assets with similar characteristics.

(more…)

The point of volatility targeting

December 30, 2017

Volatility targeting adjusts the leverage of a portfolio inversely to predicted volatility. Since market volatility is predictable in the short run and returns are not this adjustment typically improves conventional risk-adjusted return measures, such as the Sharpe ratio. An empirical analysis for the U.S. equity market over the past 90 years confirms this point but suggests that the real key benefit of volatility targeting is the reduction of outsized drawdowns in extreme market situations. That is because large cumulative losses mostly occur when market volatility remains high for long. On these occasions volatility targeting has benefits somewhat similar to a momentum strategy, selling risk early into market turmoil, thereby positioning for escalation.

(more…)

The correlation of equity and bond returns

December 16, 2017

History shows that the correlation of equity and bond returns has been either positive or negative for prolonged periods of time. Monetary policy has played a key role for the direction of equity-bond correlation. In periods of restrictive monetary policy the correlation has been positive. In periods of low inflation and accommodative monetary policy the equity-bond correlation has been negative. The latter regime has predominated since the late 1990s and is critical for performance and sustainability of risk-parity trading strategies.

(more…)

The downside variance risk premium

December 9, 2017

The variance risk premium of an asset is the difference between options-implied and actual expected return variation. It can be viewed as a price for hedging against variation in volatility. However, attitudes towards volatility are asymmetric: large upside moves are fine while large downside moves are scary. A measure of aversion to negative volatility is the downside variance risk premium, the difference between options-implied and actual expected downside variation of returns. It is this downside volatility risk that investors want to protect against and whose hedging price is a valid and apparently robust indicator of future returns. Similarly, the skewness risk premium, the difference between upside and downside variance risk premia, is also a powerful predictor of markets.

(more…)

The 1×1 of risk perception measures

December 1, 2017

There are two reasons why macro traders watch risk perceptions. First, sudden spikes often trigger subsequent flows and macroeconomic change. Second, implausibly high or low values indicate risk premium opportunities or setback risks. Key types of risk and uncertainty measures include [1] keyword-based newspaper article counts that measure policy and geopolitical uncertainty, [2] survey-based economic forecast discrepancies, [3] asset price-based measures of fear and uncertainty and [4] derivatives-implied cost of hedging against directional risk and price volatility.

(more…)

The predictability of relative asset returns

November 4, 2017

Empirical research suggests that it is easier to predict relative returns within an asset class than to predict absolute returns. Also, out-of-sample value generation with standard factors has been more robust for relative positions than for outright directional positions. This has been shown for bond, equity and currency markets. Importantly, directional and relative predictability have been complementary sources of investment returns, suggesting that using both will produce best performance.

(more…)

How to use financial conditions indices

October 14, 2017

There are two ways to use financial conditions indicators for macro trading. First, the tightening of aggregate financial conditions helps forecasting macroeconomic dynamics and policy responses. Second, financial vulnerability indicators, such as leverage and credit aggregates, help predicting the impact of an initial adverse shock to growth or financial markets on the subsequent macroeconomic and market dynamics. The latest IMF Global Financial Report has provided some clues as to how to combine these effects with existing economic-financial data.

(more…)

The latent factors behind commodity price indices

October 7, 2017

A 35-year empirical study suggests that about one third of the monthly changes in a broad commodity price index can be attributed to a single global factor that is related to the business cycle. In fact, for a non-fuel commodity basket almost 70% of price changes can be explained by this factor. By contrast, oil and energy price indices have been driven mainly by a fuels-specific factor that is conventionally associated with supply shocks. Short-term price changes of individual commodities depend more on contract-specific events, but also display a significant influence of global and sectoral factors. The latent global factor seems to help forecasting commodity index prices at shorter horizons.

(more…)

Critical transitions in financial markets

September 30, 2017

Critical transitions in financial markets are shifts in prices and operational structure to a new equilibrium after reaching a tipping point. “Complexity theory” helps analysing and predicting such transitions in large systems. Quantitative indicators of a market regime change can be a slowdown in corrections to small perturbations, increased autocorrelation of prices, increased variance and skewness of prices, and a “flickering” of markets between different states. A new research paper applies complexity theory to changes in euro area fixed income markets that arose from non-conventional policy. It finds that quantitative indicators heralded critical structural shifts in unsecured money markets and high-grade bond markets.

(more…)

Hedging FX trades against unwanted risk

September 23, 2017

When FX forward positions express views on country-specific developments one can shape the trade to its rationale by hedging against significant unrelated global influences. Almost all major exchange rates are sensitive to directional global market moves and USD-based exchange rates are typically also exposed to EURUSD changes. A simple empirical analysis for 29 currencies for 1999-2017 suggests that the largest part of these influences has been predictable out-of-sample and hence “hedgeable”. Even volatility-adjusted relative positions across EM or FX carry currencies may sometimes be hedged against market directional influences.

(more…)

Tags

Tags
ABOUT US

Macrosynergy is a London based macroeconomic research and technology company whose founders have developed and employed macro quantamental investment strategies in liquid, tradable asset classes, across many markets and for a variety of different factors to generate competitive, uncorrelated investment returns for institutional investors for two decades. Our quantitative-fundamental (quantamental) computing system tracks a broad range of real-time macroeconomic trends in developed and emerging countries, transforming them into macro systematic quantamental investment strategies. In June 2020 Macrosynergy and J.P. Morgan started a collaboration to scale the quantamental system and to popularize tradable economics across financial markets.

FOLLOW US
Linkedin
LEGAL
Research
Quantamental Academy
About Us
Macro-quantamental investment handbook