Shadow banking and the backstop problem

Modern shadow banking provides large-scale risk transformation services that are highly pro-cyclical (view post here). This is a systemic concern mainly for one reason: most shadow banking activities lack formal transparent backstops, i.e. external risk absorption mechanisms that prevent large negative shocks from escalating.

(more…)

The case for monitoring shadow banking risks

Another Federal Reserve paper on shadow banking emphasizes its systemic risks. In particular, shadow banking seems to have a tendency to accumulate tail risks, relies on fragile funding conditions (without official backstop), and is subject to pronounced pro-cyclicality. Shadow banking activity is tied to core regulated institutions and, hence, is a valid concern for broad financial stability.

(more…)

Shadow banking: A review of the basics

The New York Fed’s Economic Policy Review provides a basic overview of past and current shadow banking activities in the U.S. and beyond. Securitization and non-bank wholesale funding remain at the heart of the system. The relevance of shadow banking is likely to recover, as capital and liquidity standards in the regulated banking system are tightening.

(more…)

CS on systemic risks of China’s shadow banking

Credit Suisse’s Dong Tao and Weishen Deng nicely summarize causes, size, and systemic risks arising from China’s rapidly growing shadown banking sector. Low regulated bank interest rates and rationed supply of credit have created ample incentives to by-pass the regular banking channels. By end-2012 the shadow banking sector has soared to about 44% of GDP and continues expanding at a torrid pace. Meanwhile, poor transparency and lack of risk management and regulation bode ill for credit and liquidity risks, and even a state bailout could involve a drastic deterioration of credit conditions.

(more…)