A short Bundesbank paper presents evidence that the Federal Reserve, the ECB, and the Bank of England have long used policy rates to stabilize financial markets in times of distress. This would suggest that implicit ‘central bank puts’ are not new and that central banks’ tendency to stabilize markets in the past has not prevented serious market dislocations.
A new ECB paper illustrates the power of a central bank’s collateral framework as a policy tool. The collateral framework influences overall monetary conditions, helps preserving financial stability, and functions even at the zero lower bound for policy rates. Liquidity regulation can be an important complement, since by themselves generous collateral buffers might invite moral hazard and encourage excessive reliance on short-term funding.
In case of further negative shocks the ECB has three final policy options. First, it could nudge its refinancing rate close to zero and become the first large central bank to introduce a negative deposit rate. Second, it could revive long-term repo operations, probably with a link to private credit and collateral enhancement, and accompanying cuts in minimum reserves and sterilization operations. Third, as a final recourse, the ECB could invoke its right to buy both public and private securities for the purpose of preserving price stability. This final step would raise most difficult operational issues, far more so than quantitative easing in other currency areas.
The Federal Reserve’s forward guidance and maturity extension policies demonstrated how non-conventional monetary policy operates through both “signaling effects” and “portfolio effects” Forward guidance reduced yields beyond the guidance period. It was treated by markets as a broader commitment to lasting accommodation, underscoring the power of signaling. The Maturity Extension Program, by contrast, raised shorter-dated rates, even within the forward guidance window, illustrating the general importance of the “portfolio effect”.
A new NBER paper reminds us of historical episodes when loose monetary policy contributed to asset price booms and busts. The paper also provides econometric evidence that low policy rates usually support asset prices. This history may not dissuade central banks from running highly accommodative policies at present, but explains the importance of accompanying macro-prudential measures.
A new staff paper summarizes the Federal Reserve’s policy framework, as it evolved in the face of the zero lower bound for interest rates. The framework is predicated on the principles of excess stimulus, history dependence, economic conditionality, and credible communication. Its main tools are interest rate forward guidance and asset purchases. A higher inflation target or a nominal income level target is under discussion. The integration of monetary and macro-prudential policies has progressed.
A recent BIS paper illustrates the consequences of highly accommodative monetary policy in the G3 for East Asia. These include lower policy rates than warranted by domestic conditions, lower bond yields and appreciation pressure on currencies. Importantly, easy G3 monetary conditions stimulate Asian foreign currency borrowing in many forms, including letters of credit, forward selling of foreign currencies and international bond issuance.
From 2015 banks will have to satisfy new liquidity standards. Of particular importance is the liquidity coverage ratio, which requires institutions to hold enough “high quality liquid assets” to withstand a 30-day period of funding stress. This will complicate the conduct of monetary policy and affect short-term yield curves, which will probably price some regulatory term premium.
Ricardo Caballero and Emmanuel Farhi from MIT and Harvard propose an interesting and relevant formal model of safe asset shortage. While safe asset supply is constrained by the fiscal capacity of sovereigns and financial innovation, demand may be in a secular ascent (driven for example by collateralization and population aging). The resulting shortfall can result in a structural drag on economic growth and impair the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies, with some resemblance to the Keynesian liquidity trap.
According to a new IMF report, unconventional monetary policies succeeded in stabilizing financial markets and lowering sovereign yields. Since protracted accommodation would invite excessive duration risk taking, the design of exit is becoming more important. Tightening may occur first through forward guidance or even rate hikes, before the vast outstanding excess reserves can be reduced back towards pre-crisis levels. This could imply greater volatility of interest rates, due to limited control of central banks over short rates and great uncertainty about the impact of tapered and reversed purchase programs on long–term yields.
Macrosynergy is a London based macroeconomic research and technology company whose founders have developed and employed macro quantamental investment strategies in liquid, tradable asset classes, across many markets and for a variety of different factors to generate competitive, uncorrelated investment returns for institutional investors for two decades. Our quantitative-fundamental (quantamental) computing system tracks a broad range of real-time macroeconomic trends in developed and emerging countries, transforming them into macro systematic quantamental investment strategies. In June 2020 Macrosynergy and J.P. Morgan started a collaboration to scale the quantamental system and to popularize tradable economics across financial markets.
