Global market portfolio: construction and performance

A representative market portfolio can be built as the capitalization-weighted average of global equity, real estate and bonds. From 1960 to 2015 such a portfolio would have recorded a dollar-denominated nominal compound return of 8.4%, a real (inflation-adjusted) return of 4.4% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.7. Equity has delivered superior absolute returns, while bonds have delivered superior risk-adjusted returns, consistent with the “low risk effect” theory (view post here). The disinflationary period delivered more than double the returns of the inflationary period. Plausibility and empirical evidence suggest that the market portfolio is not efficient.

(more…)

Cross-asset carry: an introduction

Carry can be defined as return for unchanged market prices and is easy to calculate in real time across assets. Carry strategies often reap risk premia and implicit subsidies. Historically, they have produced positive returns in FX, commodities, bonds and equity. Carry strategies can also be combined across asset classes to render diversification benefits. Historically, since 1990, the performance of such diversified carry portfolios has been strong, with Sharpe ratios close to 1, limited correlation to benchmark indices and less of a downside skew that FX carry trades.

(more…)

Explaining FX forward bias

Forward bias in foreign exchange markets means that a positive interest rate differential precedes currency appreciation. It has been an empirical regularity in developed FX markets in recent decades. The forward bias contradicts traditional theory: positive risk-adjusted interest rate differentials are supposed to be offset by expected currency depreciation. An academic paper explains how FX forward bias arises when central banks ‘lean against the wind’ of appreciation through sterilized FX interventions.

(more…)

What traders can learn from market price volatility

Equity and bond market volatility can be decomposed into persistent and transitory components by means of statistical methods. The distinction is relevant for macro trading because plausibility and empirical research suggest that the persistent component is associated with macroeconomic fundamentals. This means that persistent volatility is an important signal itself and that its sustainability depends on macroeconomic trends and events. Meanwhile, the transitory component, if correctly identified, is more closely associated with market sentiment and can indicate mean-reverting price dynamics.

(more…)

Why financial markets misprice fundamental value

Experimental research has produced robust evidence for mispricing of assets relative to their fundamental values even with active trading and sufficient information. Academic studies support a wide range of causes for such mispricing, including asset supply, peer performance pressure, overconfidence in private information, speculative overpricing, risk aversion, confusion about macroeconomic signals and – more generally – inexperience and cognitive limitations of market participants.

(more…)

FX strategies based on quanto contract information

Quantos are derivatives that settle in currencies different from the denomination of the underlying contract. Therefore, quanto index contracts for the S&P 500 provide information on the premia that investors are willing to pay for a currency’s risk and hedge value with respect to U.S. stocks. Currencies that command high risk premia and provide little hedge value should have superior future returns. These premia can be directly inferred from quanto forward prices, without estimation. Empirical evidence supports the case for quanto contracts as a valid signal generator of FX strategies.

(more…)

Simple international macroeconomics for trading

Simple New Keynesian macroeconomic models work well for analyzing the impact of various types of shocks on small open economies and emerging markets. The models are a bit more complex than those for large economies, because one must consider the exchange rate, terms-of-trade and financial pressure. Yet understanding some basic connections between market factors and the overall economy already supports intuition for macro trading strategies. Moreover, the analysis of the effect of various shocks is possible in simple diagrams.

(more…)

Simple macroeconomics for trading

Most modern dynamic economic models are too complex and ambiguous to support macro trading. A practical alternative is a simplified static model of the “New Keynesian” tradition that combines basic insights from dynamic equilibrium theory with an intuitive and memorable representation. Macro traders can analyse real life events in this framework my shifting curves in a simple diagram. In this way they can analyse the effect of fiscal policy shocks, monetary policy shocks, inflation expectation shocks, economic supply shocks and so forth. Part 1 of this post focuses on a model for a large closed economy (or the world as a whole).

(more…)

The “low risk effect” in financial markets

Low-beta and low-volatility securities can produce superior risk-adjusted returns. Thus, portfolios of calibrated low- versus high-vol stock positions have historically generated significant alpha. Other asset classes display similar ‘low risk effects’. Their plausible cause is many investors’ limited access to leverage and willingness to pay a premium for securities with greater exposure to market performance. Some investors may also pay a premium for lottery-like payoffs with large upside potential. For leveraged portfolio managers this creates relative value opportunities in form of ‘betting against market correlation’ or ‘betting against volatility’.

(more…)

Explosive dynamics in exchange rates

Explosiveness in financial markets means that prices display exponential growth. In recent years statistical tests have been developed to locate mildly explosive bubble periods in real time. In conjunction with judgment on underlying fundamentals they help detecting price distortions. A new paper shows how tests for explosiveness can be applied to exchange rates. The tests suggest that developed market currencies have recurrently experienced episodes of explosive behaviour, reaching from a few days to up to three months. Currency level changes seem to reverse subsequently. Periods of explosiveness since 2000 have often been related to the U.S. dollar and financial market volatility.

(more…)