Home » Research » Basics of Systematic Value

Basics of Systematic Value

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Basic Summaries on Systematic Value” font_container=”tag:h2|text_align:center” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Systematic Value I: Macro Information Efficiency” font_container=”tag:h3|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”A Practical Overview” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmacro-efficiency%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”7385″ img_size=”370×200″ style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/macro-efficiency/”][vc_column_text]Information efficiency of an investment manager helps individual returns. Information efficiency of the overall market helps the economy, because market prices guide decisions of companies, governments and households. Qualified macro research is expensive; improving its productivity and translating it into factors for trading strategies is a major source of systematic value. A useful structure for such factors is to divide them into three areas:  [i] fundamental valuation gaps, [ii] implicit subsidies, and [iii] setback risks to fundamentally sensible investment principles. Read more[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_custom_heading text=”Fundamental Value” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmacro-efficiency%2Ffundamental-value-2%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”2428″ img_size=”370×200″ style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/macro-efficiency/fundamental-value-2/”][vc_column_text]The difference between market price and fundamental value estimate is one type of “valuation gap” indicator. It is arguably the most challenging approach, since it must encompass all important relevant information simultaneously and requires both financial and macroeconomic modeling skills. Popular valuation ratios, such as equity earnings yields or real effective exchange rates, can form the basis of a valuation gap, but what is critical is their relation to a plausible theoretical value that accords with the economic environment. Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_custom_heading text=”Macro Trends” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmacro-efficiency%2Fmacrotrends-2%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”2429″ img_size=”370×200″ add_caption=”yes” style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/macro-efficiency/macrotrends-2/”][vc_column_text]Macroeconomic trends are price factors for virtually all traded securities. Hence, changes to expectations of these trends are classic market movers, in particular if their long-term prospects are not “anchored”. Importantly, the influence of unanticipated economic changes is more dominant over longer horizons than is visible in day-to-day fluctuations. In many cases the direction of the impact of medium-term economic change is straightforward and intuitive enough for non-economists. Even information on the state of economic uncertainty can provide valuable information for macro trading strategies, as it affects both volatility and direction of market prices and helps to detect periods of complacency and panic.
As a consequence, applying best practices to create macro trend indicators has great value. There are three major sources of information: economic data, financial market data and expert judgment. Since the range of available indicators is vast one must condense them into a manageable set through plausible theoretical models and statistical estimation methods. Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_custom_heading text=”Implicit Subsidies” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmacro-efficiency%2Fimplicit-subsidies%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”2432″ img_size=”370×200″ add_caption=”yes” style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/macro-efficiency/implicit-subsidies/”][vc_column_text]We define implicit subsidy as a premium that is paid to financial investors by other market participants through significant transactions or commitments for reasons other than conventional risk-return optimization. Implicit subsidies are more like fees for services than compensation for standard financial risk. Detecting and receiving such subsidies creates risk-adjusted value. Implicit subsidies are paid in all major markets. Receiving them often comes with risks of crowded positioning and recurrent setbacks. Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_custom_heading text=”Mitigating Setback Risk” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmacro-efficiency%2Fsetback-risk%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”2430″ img_size=”370×200″ style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/macro-efficiency/setback-risk/”][vc_column_text]We define setback risk as a gap between downside and upside risk of an asset or a trade that is unrelated to its fundamental value proposition. It arises from the market’s “internal dynamics” – as opposed to changes in fundamental value – and is a handicap for valid but popular trading strategies. Setback risk consists of two components: positioning and exit probability. Positioning refers to the “crowdedness” of a trade and indicates the potential size of a setback. Exit probability refers to the vulnerability of positions and indicates the likelihood of liquidations.  Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Systematic Value II: Price Distortions” font_container=”tag:h3|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Trading Strategies Based on Price Distortions” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fprice-distortions%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”7734″ img_size=”370×200″ style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/price-distortions/”][vc_column_text]Price distortions are apparent price-value gaps. Trading strategies that are based on such distortions rely less on information advantage than on consistent price monitoring, flexibility of trading, privileged market access, superior financial product knowledge and –  most of all – a rational attitude in turbulent times. Price distortions arise from inefficient flows and prevail as long as a sizable share of market participants is either unwilling or unable to respond to obvious dislocations. There are many causes of such inefficiencies, including risk management rules, liquidity disruptions, mechanical rebalancing rules and government interventions. Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Systematic Value III: Systemic Risk Management” font_container=”tag:h3|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Generating Value Through Managing Systemic Risk” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:http%3A%2F%2Fmacrosynergy.com%2Fmanaging-risk%2F|||”][vc_single_image image=”7389″ img_size=”370×200″ style=”vc_box_shadow_3d” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://macrosynergy.com/managing-risk/”][vc_column_text]Systemic crises are rare. But they are make-or-break events for long-term performance and social relevance of investment managers. In systemic crises conventional investment strategies lose big. The rules of efficient positioning are turned upside down. Trends follow distressed flows away from best value and institutions abandon return optimization for the sake of preserving capital and liquidity. It is hard to predict systemic events, but through consistent research it is possible to improve judgment on systemic vulnerabilities. When crisis-like dynamics get underway this is crucial for liquidating early, following the right trends and avoiding trades in extreme illiquidity. Crisis opportunities favor the prepared, who has set up emergency protocols, a realistic calibration of tail risk and an active exchange of market risk information with other managers and institutions. Read more.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]


Related articles